TSLY vs. ENFR
TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. TSLY is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSLY returned 10.28%/yr vs 28.39%/yr for ENFR. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
TSLY vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLY achieves a -5.22% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 25.97% return.
TSLY
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -5.22%
- 6M
- -7.03%
- 1Y
- 29.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 25.97%
- 6M
- 26.39%
- 1Y
- 26.50%
- 3Y*
- 28.39%
- 5Y*
- 19.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
TSLY vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | -5.22% | 13.62% | 27.83% | 50.69% | -27.09% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 25.97% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | -6.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLY and ENFR is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022 | 0.17 |
The correlation between TSLY and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLY vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
TSLY
ENFR
TSLY vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLY | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.31 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 3.08 | -1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.27 | 8.18 | -4.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLY vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLY drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLY and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLY | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.52% | -68.28% | +18.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.64% | -8.64% | -13.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.52% | -15.58% | -33.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.38% | -3.91% | -7.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.92% | -15.95% | -3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.09% | 3.25% | +5.84% |
Volatility
TSLY vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.63%. This indicates that TSLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLY | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.68% | 5.63% | +7.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.97% | 11.48% | +12.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.92% | 14.66% | +21.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.59% | 19.30% | +26.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.59% | 24.67% | +20.92% |
TSLY vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLY vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
TSLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.90%, more than ENFR's 3.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.98% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 83.90% | 91.19% | 82.30% | 76.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLY and ENFR have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLY has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to ENFR (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLY dropped -49.52% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
On 3-year performance, ENFR leads with 28.39% vs 10.28% for TSLY. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 28.39% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLY.
TSLY has the higher dividend yield at 83.90%, compared with 3.98% for ENFR.
TSLY is categorized as Options Trading, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLY and 0.35% for ENFR.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLY and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer