TSLW vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TSLW (Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLW returned 23.67% vs 282.56% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.42, they often move in opposite directions. TSLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

TSLW vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLW achieves a -17.23% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -23.27% return.

TSLW

• 1D: -3.72%
• 1M: -3.84%
• 6M: -16.87%
• YTD: -17.23%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 5.07%
• 1M: 46.38%
• 6M: -9.68%
• YTD: -23.27%
• 1Y: 282.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLW vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF	-17.23%	35.28%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-23.27%	230.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLW and MSTZ is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025	-0.42

Return for Risk

TSLW vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLW

TSLW Risk / Return Rank: 19
TSLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
TSLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
TSLW Omega Ratio Rank: 20
TSLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
TSLW Martin Ratio Rank: 18

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 68
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLW vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSLW	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	1.92	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	2.45	-1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.32	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	3.35	-2.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.40	6.53	-5.13

TSLW vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLW Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLW and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSLW vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLW drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLW and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLW	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.80%	-99.38%	+63.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.80%	-84.89%	+49.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.41%	-97.39%	+71.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.85%	-94.53%	+80.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.92%	43.51%	-26.59%

Volatility

TSLW vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) is 20.82%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.56%. This indicates that TSLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLW	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.82%	56.56%	-35.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.41%	135.11%	-97.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.62%	148.53%	-94.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.26%	171.02%	-113.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.26%	171.02%	-113.76%

TSLW vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLW vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

TSLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 92.94%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF	92.94%	49.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLW and MSTZ in my portfolio?

TSLW and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLW or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.56%) compared to TSLW (20.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLW dropped -35.80% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, TSLW or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 282.56% vs 23.67% for TSLW. On fees, TSLW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSLW has been the lower-risk option at 20.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLW or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 282.56% return vs 23.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLW or MSTZ?

TSLW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLW or MSTZ?

TSLW has the higher dividend yield at 92.94%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between TSLW and MSTZ?

TSLW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLW and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.