TSLS vs. GPIQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Tesla Inc (--100%), while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. TSLS is passively managed, while GPIQ is actively managed. Over the past year, TSLS returned -18.80% vs 32.06% for GPIQ. At a correlation of -0.58, they often move in opposite directions. TSLS charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.

Performance

TSLS vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLS achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 14.86% return.

TSLS

• 1D: 5.18%
• 1M: 9.46%
• YTD: 12.45%
• 6M: 21.31%
• 1Y: -18.80%
• 3Y*: -32.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GPIQ

• 1D: -2.96%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 14.86%
• 6M: 13.78%
• 1Y: 32.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLS vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares	12.45%	-34.95%	-55.71%	-15.91%
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	14.86%	19.77%	23.22%	15.17%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLS and GPIQ is -0.60, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023	-0.58

The correlation between TSLS and GPIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.60 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSLS vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLS

TSLS Risk / Return Rank: 6
TSLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
TSLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
TSLS Omega Ratio Rank: 6
TSLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
TSLS Martin Ratio Rank: 6

GPIQ

GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 69
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLS vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSLS	GPIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	2.12	-2.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.35	2.79	-3.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.39	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	3.38	-3.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.62	14.28	-14.90

TSLS vs. GPIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLS Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the GPIQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLS and GPIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSLS vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLS drawdown since its inception was -90.73%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLS and GPIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLS	GPIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.73%	-21.06%	-69.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.46%	-9.51%	-33.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-84.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.66%	-3.21%	-85.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.77%	-2.27%	-61.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.42%	2.25%	+28.17%

Volatility

TSLS vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) has a higher volatility of 13.77% compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) at 7.78%. This indicates that TSLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLS	GPIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.77%	7.78%	+5.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.37%	12.52%	+15.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.91%	15.17%	+29.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.68%	17.88%	+40.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.68%	17.88%	+40.80%

TSLS vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLS vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than GPIQ's 9.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	9.60%	9.81%	9.18%	1.74%	0.00%
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares	3.11%	4.30%	7.62%	4.52%	3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLS and GPIQ in my portfolio?

TSLS and GPIQ have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLS or GPIQ?

TSLS has higher volatility (13.77%) compared to GPIQ (7.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLS dropped -90.73% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.

Which ETF is better, TSLS or GPIQ?

On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 32.06% vs -18.80% for TSLS. On fees, GPIQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLS or GPIQ?

Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 32.06% return vs -18.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLS or GPIQ?

GPIQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLS or GPIQ?

GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.60%, compared with 3.11% for TSLS.

What is the main difference between TSLS and GPIQ?

TSLS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLS and 0.29% for GPIQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.