TSLS vs. DOG
TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares) and DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) are both Inverse Equities funds - TSLS tracks the Tesla Inc (--100%) while DOG tracks the DJ Industrial Average (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSLS returned -38.35%/yr vs -8.62%/yr for DOG. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLS charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DOG.
Performance
TSLS vs. DOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLS achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly higher than DOG's -5.22% return.
TSLS
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -8.56%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- -2.42%
- 1Y
- -29.14%
- 3Y*
- -38.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOG
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- YTD
- -5.22%
- 6M
- -5.93%
- 1Y
- -14.18%
- 3Y*
- -8.62%
- 5Y*
- -5.63%
- 10Y*
- -11.28%
TSLS vs. DOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.03% | -34.95% | -55.71% | -60.12% | 100.52% |
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -5.22% | -8.40% | -5.62% | -7.05% | -1.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLS and DOG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLS vs. DOG — Risk / Return Rank
TSLS
DOG
TSLS vs. DOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLS | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | -1.18 | +0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | -1.61 | +0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.82 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | -0.98 | +0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | -1.62 | +0.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLS | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | -1.18 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | -0.57 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
TSLS vs. DOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLS drawdown since its inception was -90.73%, roughly equal to the maximum DOG drawdown of -92.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLS and DOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLS | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.73% | -92.69% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.42% | -14.63% | -31.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.16% | -28.77% | -55.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.61% | -92.69% | +3.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.47% | -66.39% | +2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.75% | 8.85% | +23.90% |
Volatility
TSLS vs. DOG - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) has a higher volatility of 12.05% compared to ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) at 3.01%. This indicates that TSLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLS | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.05% | 3.01% | +9.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.72% | 9.33% | +18.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.68% | 12.07% | +34.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.79% | 14.78% | +44.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.79% | 17.49% | +41.30% |
TSLS vs. DOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than DOG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLS vs. DOG - Dividend Comparison
TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than DOG's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.53% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.39% | 4.30% | 7.62% | 4.52% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLS and DOG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to DOG (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLS dropped -90.73% vs DOG's -92.69%.
On 3-year performance, DOG leads with -8.62% vs -38.35% for TSLS. On fees, DOG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DOG has performed better with a -8.62% return vs -38.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DOG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLS.
DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 3.39% for TSLS.
TSLS tracks Tesla Inc (--100%), while DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLS and 0.95% for DOG.
TSLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLS and DOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer