TSLR vs. TSL
TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) and TSL (GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLR returned 8.94% vs 20.41% for TSL. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TSLR charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for TSL.
Performance
TSLR vs. TSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLR achieves a -20.05% return, which is significantly lower than TSL's -9.40% return.
TSLR
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 13.88%
- YTD
- -20.05%
- 6M
- -20.52%
- 1Y
- 8.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSL
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- -9.40%
- 6M
- -9.11%
- 1Y
- 20.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLR vs. TSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -20.05% | -25.97% | 67.57% | 1.69% |
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | -9.40% | 3.49% | 64.12% | 3.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLR and TSL is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023 | 1.00 |
The correlation between TSLR and TSL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
TSLR vs. TSL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSLR
TSL
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSLR
TSL
Basic Materials
TSLR
-
TSL
-
Communication Services
TSLR
-
TSL
-
Consumer Defensive
TSLR
-
TSL
-
Energy
TSLR
-
TSL
-
Financial Services
TSLR
-
TSL
-
Healthcare
TSLR
-
TSL
-
Industrials
TSLR
-
TSL
-
Real Estate
TSLR
-
TSL
-
Technology
TSLR
-
TSL
-
Utilities
TSLR
-
TSL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLR vs. TSL — Risk / Return Rank
TSLR
TSL
TSLR vs. TSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLR | TSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.11 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 0.55 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 1.26 | -0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLR | TSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | 0.35 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.03 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
TSLR vs. TSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, which is greater than TSL's maximum drawdown of -74.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and TSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLR | TSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.80% | -74.52% | -8.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.37% | -36.98% | -17.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -63.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.09% | -24.91% | -34.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.24% | -38.71% | -11.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.45% | 16.38% | +10.07% |
Volatility
TSLR vs. TSL - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) has a higher volatility of 24.40% compared to GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) at 15.25%. This indicates that TSLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLR | TSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.40% | 15.25% | +9.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.65% | 34.12% | +20.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.75% | 57.94% | +34.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 115.54% | 73.18% | +42.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.54% | 73.18% | +42.36% |
TSLR vs. TSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLR has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSL's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLR vs. TSL - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSLR nor TSL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 60.47% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, TSLR and TSL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TSLR has higher volatility (24.40%) compared to TSL (15.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLR dropped -82.80% vs TSL's -74.52%.
On 1-year performance, TSL leads with 20.41% vs 8.94% for TSLR. On fees, TSL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, TSL has been the lower-risk option at 15.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSL has performed better with a 20.41% return vs 8.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.
TSLR and TSL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSLR and 1.15% for TSL.
TSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLR and TSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer