PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLR vs. TSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLR vs. TSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLR achieves a -20.05% return, which is significantly lower than TSL's -9.40% return.


TSLR

1D
-0.17%
1M
13.88%
YTD
-20.05%
6M
-20.52%
1Y
8.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSL

1D
-0.11%
1M
9.37%
YTD
-9.40%
6M
-9.11%
1Y
20.41%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLR vs. TSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
-20.05%-25.97%67.57%1.69%
TSL
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF
-9.40%3.49%64.12%3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLR and TSL is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023

1.00

The correlation between TSLR and TSL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

TSLR vs. TSL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TSLR
TSL

Consumer Cyclical

66.6%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

TSLR
66.6%
TSL
100.0%

Basic Materials

TSLR

-

TSL

-

Communication Services

TSLR

-

TSL

-

Consumer Defensive

TSLR

-

TSL

-

Energy

TSLR

-

TSL

-

Financial Services

TSLR

-

TSL

-

Healthcare

TSLR

-

TSL

-

Industrials

TSLR

-

TSL

-

Real Estate

TSLR

-

TSL

-

Technology

TSLR

-

TSL

-

Utilities

TSLR

-

TSL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLR vs. TSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLR
TSLR Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

TSL
TSL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLR vs. TSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLRTSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.11

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

0.55

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.34

1.26

-0.91

TSLR vs. TSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the TSL Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLR and TSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLRTSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

0.35

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.03

-0.03

Drawdowns

TSLR vs. TSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, which is greater than TSL's maximum drawdown of -74.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and TSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLRTSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.80%

-74.52%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.37%

-36.98%

-17.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.09%

-24.91%

-34.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.24%

-38.71%

-11.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.45%

16.38%

+10.07%

Volatility

TSLR vs. TSL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) has a higher volatility of 24.40% compared to GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) at 15.25%. This indicates that TSLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLRTSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.40%

15.25%

+9.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.65%

34.12%

+20.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.75%

57.94%

+34.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

115.54%

73.18%

+42.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

115.54%

73.18%

+42.36%

TSLR vs. TSL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLR has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLR vs. TSL - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSLR nor TSL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
TSL
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%60.47%
TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, TSLR and TSL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSLR has higher volatility (24.40%) compared to TSL (15.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLR dropped -82.80% vs TSL's -74.52%.

On 1-year performance, TSL leads with 20.41% vs 8.94% for TSLR. On fees, TSL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, TSL has been the lower-risk option at 15.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSL has performed better with a 20.41% return vs 8.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.

TSLR and TSL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSLR and 1.15% for TSL.

TSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLR and TSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer