PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLR vs. TQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TSLR vs. TQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TSLR vs. TQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
-35.45%53.06%
TQQY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF
-7.53%-5.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLR achieves a -35.45% return, which is significantly lower than TQQY's -7.53% return.


TSLR

1D
9.25%
1M
-16.38%
YTD
-35.45%
6M
-39.21%
1Y
36.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TQQY

1D
2.44%
1M
-8.84%
YTD
-7.53%
6M
-13.56%
1Y
5.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TSLR vs. TQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLR has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQY's 1.07% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TSLR vs. TQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLR
TSLR Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQY
TQQY Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLR vs. TQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLRTQQYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.33

0.25

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

0.45

+0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.07

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

0.30

+0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.35

0.82

+0.53

TSLR vs. TQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the TQQY Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLR and TQQY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLRTQQYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

0.25

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

-0.44

+0.38

Correlation

The correlation between TSLR and TQQY is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TSLR vs. TQQY - Dividend Comparison

TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.26%.


Drawdowns

TSLR vs. TQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, which is greater than TQQY's maximum drawdown of -25.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and TQQY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLRTQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.80%

-25.31%

-57.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.66%

-19.35%

-31.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.96%

-17.39%

-49.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.38%

-9.73%

-39.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.76%

7.00%

+16.76%

Volatility

TSLR vs. TQQY - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) has a higher volatility of 22.54% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) at 7.65%. This indicates that TSLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TSLRTQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.54%

7.65%

+14.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.76%

18.68%

+41.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

110.88%

23.65%

+87.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

117.43%

25.44%

+91.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

117.43%

25.44%

+91.99%