TSLR vs. SPMO
TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLR is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. TSLR is actively managed, while SPMO is passively managed. Over the past year, TSLR returned 19.41% vs 43.47% for SPMO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLR charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
TSLR vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLR achieves a -27.58% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.15% return.
TSLR
- 1D
- 3.62%
- 1M
- -19.09%
- YTD
- -27.58%
- 6M
- -31.37%
- 1Y
- 19.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 43.47%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
TSLR vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -27.58% | -25.97% | 67.57% | 1.69% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 13.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLR and SPMO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | 0.48 |
TSLR vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSLR
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSLR
SPMO
Basic Materials
TSLR
-
SPMO
Communication Services
TSLR
-
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
TSLR
-
SPMO
Energy
TSLR
-
SPMO
Financial Services
TSLR
-
SPMO
Healthcare
TSLR
-
SPMO
Industrials
TSLR
-
SPMO
Real Estate
TSLR
-
SPMO
Technology
TSLR
-
SPMO
Utilities
TSLR
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLR vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
TSLR
SPMO
TSLR vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLR | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.41 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 3.44 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.73 | 13.01 | -12.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLR vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLR | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.80% | -30.95% | -51.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.37% | -12.70% | -41.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.94% | -1.68% | -61.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.31% | -4.60% | -45.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.72% | 3.35% | +23.37% |
Volatility
TSLR vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) has a higher volatility of 28.92% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 10.29%. This indicates that TSLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLR | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.92% | 10.29% | +18.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.66% | 16.73% | +40.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.10% | 19.48% | +69.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 115.61% | 19.65% | +95.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.61% | 20.48% | +95.13% |
TSLR vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLR has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLR vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLR and SPMO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLR has higher volatility (28.92%) compared to SPMO (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLR dropped -82.80% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 1-year performance, SPMO leads with 43.47% vs 19.41% for TSLR. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 43.47% return vs 19.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.
TSLR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSLR and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLR and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer