TSLR vs. QTUM

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLR is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. TSLR is actively managed, while QTUM is passively managed. Over the past year, TSLR returned 19.41% vs 82.93% for QTUM. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLR charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

TSLR vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLR achieves a -27.58% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 47.39% return.

TSLR

• 1D: 3.62%
• 1M: -19.09%
• YTD: -27.58%
• 6M: -31.37%
• 1Y: 19.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTUM

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 9.88%
• YTD: 47.39%
• 6M: 45.72%
• 1Y: 82.93%
• 3Y*: 48.15%
• 5Y*: 28.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLR vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF	-27.58%	-25.97%	67.57%	1.69%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	47.39%	36.65%	50.54%	11.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLR and QTUM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023	0.52

The correlation between TSLR and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

TSLR vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TSLR	QTUM
Consumer Cyclical	66.6%	0.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	0.6%
Industrials	-	8.7%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	85.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TSLR vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLR

TSLR Risk / Return Rank: 16
TSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
TSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
TSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 18
TSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
TSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 13

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 90
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLR vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSLR	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	2.94	-2.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.94	3.45	-2.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.46	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	5.46	-5.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.73	19.77	-19.04

TSLR vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLR and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSLR vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLR	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.80%	-38.45%	-44.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.37%	-15.26%	-39.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.94%	-4.42%	-58.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.31%	-8.24%	-42.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.72%	4.21%	+22.51%

Volatility

TSLR vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) has a higher volatility of 28.92% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 14.18%. This indicates that TSLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLR	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.92%	14.18%	+14.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.66%	23.17%	+34.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	89.10%	28.39%	+60.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	115.61%	26.99%	+88.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	115.61%	27.40%	+88.21%

TSLR vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLR has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLR vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.73%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLR and QTUM in my portfolio?

TSLR and QTUM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLR or QTUM?

TSLR has higher volatility (28.92%) compared to QTUM (14.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLR dropped -82.80% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

Which ETF is better, TSLR or QTUM?

On 1-year performance, QTUM leads with 82.93% vs 19.41% for TSLR. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 14.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLR or QTUM?

Over the 1-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 82.93% return vs 19.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLR or QTUM?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLR or QTUM?

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.

What is the main difference between TSLR and QTUM?

TSLR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSLR and 0.40% for QTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.