PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLR vs. NVDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLR vs. NVDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLR achieves a -20.05% return, which is significantly lower than NVDG's 18.93% return.


TSLR

1D
-0.17%
1M
13.88%
YTD
-20.05%
6M
-20.52%
1Y
8.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDG

1D
-7.35%
1M
14.07%
YTD
18.93%
6M
26.05%
1Y
83.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLR vs. NVDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
-20.05%-25.97%-16.81%
NVDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF
18.93%32.45%-0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLR and NVDG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLR vs. NVDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLR
TSLR Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDG
NVDG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NVDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDG Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLR vs. NVDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLRNVDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.22

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

1.96

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.34

4.44

-4.10

TSLR vs. NVDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the NVDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLR and NVDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLRNVDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

1.24

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.40

-0.40

Drawdowns

TSLR vs. NVDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, which is greater than NVDG's maximum drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and NVDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLRNVDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.80%

-66.19%

-16.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.37%

-42.72%

-11.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.09%

-18.34%

-40.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.24%

-23.07%

-27.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.45%

18.77%

+7.68%

Volatility

TSLR vs. NVDG - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) have volatilities of 24.40% and 25.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLRNVDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.40%

25.14%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.65%

50.15%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.75%

67.81%

+24.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

115.54%

90.72%

+24.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

115.54%

90.72%

+24.82%

TSLR vs. NVDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLR has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLR vs. NVDG - Dividend Comparison

TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.93%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TSLR and NVDG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDG has higher volatility (25.14%) compared to TSLR (24.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLR dropped -82.80% vs NVDG's -66.19%.

On 1-year performance, NVDG leads with 83.14% vs 8.94% for TSLR. On fees, NVDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TSLR has been the lower-risk option at 24.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDG has performed better with a 83.14% return vs 8.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.

NVDG has the higher dividend yield at 9.93%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSLR and 0.75% for NVDG.

NVDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLR and NVDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer