PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLR vs. MULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TSLR vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TSLR vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
-35.45%-25.97%42.27%
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
18.59%558.51%-40.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLR achieves a -35.45% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 18.59% return.


TSLR

1D
9.25%
1M
-16.38%
YTD
-35.45%
6M
-39.21%
1Y
36.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MULL

1D
9.98%
1M
-37.16%
YTD
18.59%
6M
194.62%
1Y
734.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TSLR vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TSLR and MULL have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Return for Risk

TSLR vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLR
TSLR Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLR vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLRMULLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.33

5.72

-5.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

3.60

-2.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.48

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

13.35

-12.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.35

37.78

-36.42

TSLR vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 5.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLR and MULL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLRMULLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

5.72

-5.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

1.62

-1.69

Correlation

The correlation between TSLR and MULL is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TSLR vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.


Drawdowns

TSLR vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and MULL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLRMULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.80%

-72.29%

-10.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.66%

-53.09%

+2.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.96%

-48.41%

-18.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.38%

-21.94%

-27.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.76%

18.76%

+5.00%

Volatility

TSLR vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) is 22.54%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 47.04%. This indicates that TSLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TSLRMULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.54%

47.04%

-24.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.76%

98.50%

-38.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

110.88%

129.87%

-18.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

117.43%

129.40%

-11.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

117.43%

129.40%

-11.97%