TSLR vs. COYY
TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) and COYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLR is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while COYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLR charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for COYY.
Performance
TSLR vs. COYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLR achieves a -20.05% return, which is significantly higher than COYY's -29.65% return.
TSLR
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 13.88%
- YTD
- -20.05%
- 6M
- -20.52%
- 1Y
- 8.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COYY
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- -7.38%
- YTD
- -29.65%
- 6M
- -39.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLR vs. COYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -20.05% | 71.60% |
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF | -29.65% | -38.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLR and COYY is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLR vs. COYY — Risk / Return Rank
TSLR
COYY
TSLR vs. COYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLR | COYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLR | COYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | -1.74 | +1.74 |
Drawdowns
TSLR vs. COYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, which is greater than COYY's maximum drawdown of -58.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and COYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLR | COYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.80% | -58.58% | -24.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.09% | -58.58% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.24% | -35.21% | -15.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.45% | — | — |
Volatility
TSLR vs. COYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLR | COYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.75% | 36.39% | +56.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 115.54% | 36.39% | +79.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.54% | 36.39% | +79.15% |
TSLR vs. COYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLR has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than COYY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLR vs. COYY - Dividend Comparison
TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 386.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF | 386.46% | 132.14% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLR and COYY have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.
COYY has the higher dividend yield at 386.46%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.
TSLR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while COYY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSLR and 1.07% for COYY.
Find the right allocation for TSLR and COYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer