TSLR vs. CONL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL).

TSLR and CONL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TSLR is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Aug 21, 2023. CONL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Aug 9, 2022.

Performance

TSLR vs. CONL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TSLR vs. CONL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF	-35.45%	-25.97%	67.57%	1.69%
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	-52.22%	-58.49%	4.23%	225.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLR achieves a -35.45% return, which is significantly higher than CONL's -52.22% return.

TSLR

• 1D: 9.25%
• 1M: -16.38%
• YTD: -35.45%
• 6M: -39.21%
• 1Y: 36.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CONL

• 1D: 16.67%
• 1M: -8.14%
• YTD: -52.22%
• 6M: -81.28%
• 1Y: -49.49%
• 3Y*: -11.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLR vs. CONL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLR has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CONL's 1.15% expense ratio.

TSLR

GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF

CONL

GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF

Return for Risk

TSLR vs. CONL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLR

TSLR Risk / Return Rank: 33
TSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
TSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
TSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 41
TSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
TSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

CONL

CONL Risk / Return Rank: 10
CONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
CONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CONL Omega Ratio Rank: 17
CONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CONL Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLR vs. CONL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLR	CONL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.33	-0.33	+0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	0.42	+0.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.05	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.63	-0.55	+1.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.35	-0.92	+2.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSLR vs. CONL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the CONL Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLR and CONL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLR	CONL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33	-0.33	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.06	-0.17	+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between TSLR and CONL is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TSLR vs. CONL - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSLR nor CONL has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.31%

Drawdowns

TSLR vs. CONL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, smaller than the maximum CONL drawdown of -93.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and CONL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLR	CONL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.80%	-93.95%	+11.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.66%	-92.02%	+41.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.96%	-91.78%	+24.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.38%	-54.28%	+4.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.76%	54.87%	-31.11%

Volatility

TSLR vs. CONL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) is 22.54%, while GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) has a volatility of 45.82%. This indicates that TSLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLR	CONL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.54%	45.82%	-23.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.76%	103.19%	-43.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	110.88%	149.22%	-38.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	117.43%	151.01%	-33.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	117.43%	151.01%	-33.58%