PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLQ vs. SH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLQ vs. SH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLQ achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly higher than SH's -5.55% return.


TSLQ

1D
11.57%
1M
18.36%
YTD
13.60%
6M
31.99%
1Y
-49.38%
3Y*
-64.10%
5Y*
10Y*

SH

1D
1.41%
1M
1.68%
YTD
-5.55%
6M
-4.58%
1Y
-14.55%
3Y*
-11.90%
5Y*
-8.40%
10Y*
-12.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLQ vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TSLQ
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF
13.60%-74.67%-83.21%-59.97%61.04%
SH
ProShares Short S&P500
-5.55%-11.35%-13.52%-14.80%-1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLQ and SH is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.55

The correlation between TSLQ and SH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLQ vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLQ
TSLQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TSLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SH
SH Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SH Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SH Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SH Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SH Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLQ vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLQSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.82

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

-0.89

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.88

-1.67

+0.80

TSLQ vs. SH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is higher than the SH Sharpe Ratio of -1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLQ and SH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLQ vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLQ drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, roughly equal to the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLQ and SH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLQSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.73%

-94.66%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.21%

-16.42%

-55.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.85%

-38.82%

-59.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.31%

-94.48%

-3.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.61%

-67.78%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.23%

9.62%

+46.61%

Volatility

TSLQ vs. SH - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a higher volatility of 27.76% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 4.80%. This indicates that TSLQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLQSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.76%

4.80%

+22.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.68%

9.83%

+46.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

89.33%

12.46%

+76.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.31%

16.95%

+77.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.31%

18.03%

+76.28%

TSLQ vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLQ has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLQ vs. SH - Dividend Comparison

TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, more than SH's 4.39% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SH
ProShares Short S&P500
4.39%4.49%6.20%5.37%1.08%0.00%0.16%1.76%1.01%0.06%
TSLQ
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF
9.30%10.56%4.95%13.35%2.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLQ and SH have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLQ has higher volatility (27.76%) compared to SH (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLQ dropped -98.73% vs SH's -94.66%.

On 3-year performance, SH leads with -11.90% vs -64.10% for TSLQ. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SH has performed better with a -11.90% return vs -64.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SH is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for TSLQ.

TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.30%, compared with 4.39% for SH.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for TSLQ and 0.89% for SH.

TSLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLQ and SH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer