PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLP vs. AMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLP vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLP achieves a -16.41% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 109.12% return.


TSLP

1D
-3.34%
1M
-3.53%
6M
-16.33%
YTD
-16.41%
1Y
13.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDY

1D
-3.74%
1M
5.57%
6M
115.38%
YTD
109.12%
1Y
190.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLP vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TSLP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF
-16.41%9.77%41.53%18.37%
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
109.12%53.93%-17.00%40.57%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLP and AMDY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLP vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLP
TSLP Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TSLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDY
AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLP vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLPAMDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.49

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

6.93

-6.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.95

15.42

-14.47

TSLP vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLP and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLP vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLP drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLP and AMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLPAMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.00%

-53.92%

+7.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.00%

-27.59%

-4.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.78%

-6.08%

-16.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.92%

-17.53%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.47%

12.39%

+2.08%

Volatility

TSLP vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) have volatilities of 18.80% and 19.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLPAMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.80%

19.13%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.99%

45.07%

-11.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.96%

57.35%

-14.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.35%

47.17%

+2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.35%

47.17%

+2.18%

TSLP vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLP vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

TSLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.07%, less than AMDY's 66.97% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
66.97%80.68%109.98%6.68%
TSLP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF
30.07%31.05%21.82%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLP and AMDY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDY has higher volatility (19.13%) compared to TSLP (18.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLP dropped -46.00% vs AMDY's -53.92%.

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 190.09% vs 13.70% for TSLP. On fees, TSLP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSLP has been the lower-risk option at 18.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 190.09% return vs 13.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 66.97%, compared with 30.07% for TSLP.

They also come from different issuers: Kurv and YieldMax ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLP and 1.23% for AMDY.

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLP and AMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer