TSLO vs. PBFR
TSLO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF) and PBFR (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLO charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBFR.
Performance
TSLO vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLO achieves a -5.63% return, which is significantly lower than PBFR's 4.52% return.
TSLO
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- -5.63%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBFR
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLO vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF | -5.63% | 20.81% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 4.52% | 3.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLO and PBFR is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLO vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank
TSLO
PBFR
TSLO vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF (TSLO) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLO | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.54 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
TSLO vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLO drawdown since its inception was -25.40%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLO and PBFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLO | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.40% | -8.50% | -16.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.53% | -0.16% | -8.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.88% | -0.63% | -7.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.53% | — |
Volatility
TSLO vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLO | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.08% | 4.33% | +33.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.08% | 6.89% | +31.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.08% | 6.89% | +31.19% |
TSLO vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLO has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLO vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison
TSLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.92%, more than PBFR's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
TSLO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF | 20.92% | 19.74% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLO and PBFR have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBFR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBFR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TSLO.
TSLO has the higher dividend yield at 20.92%, compared with 0.01% for PBFR.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for TSLO and 0.50% for PBFR.
Find the right allocation for TSLO and PBFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer