TSLO vs. EAPR
TSLO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF) and EAPR (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. TSLO is actively managed, while EAPR is passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLO charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EAPR.
Performance
TSLO vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLO achieves a -9.40% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 9.33% return.
TSLO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- -9.40%
- 6M
- -12.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAPR
- 1D
- -2.64%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 6M
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- 18.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 4.84%
- 10Y*
- —
TSLO vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF | -9.40% | 18.49% |
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April | 9.33% | 4.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLO and EAPR is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLO vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank
TSLO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EAPR
TSLO vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF (TSLO) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLO | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.57 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.65 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 25.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLO vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLO drawdown since its inception was -25.40%, which is greater than EAPR's maximum drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLO and EAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLO | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.40% | -17.65% | -7.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.19% | -2.64% | -9.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.20% | -4.04% | -4.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.72% | — |
Volatility
TSLO vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLO | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.57% | 8.68% | +29.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.57% | 10.33% | +28.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.57% | 10.21% | +28.36% |
TSLO vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLO has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLO vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison
TSLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.79%, while EAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF | 21.79% | 19.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLO and EAPR have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EAPR.
TSLO has the higher dividend yield at 21.79%, compared with 0.00% for EAPR.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for TSLO and 0.89% for EAPR.
Find the right allocation for TSLO and EAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer