PBFR vs. XXXX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX).

PBFR and XXXX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PBFR is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Jun 11, 2024. XXXX is a passively managed fund by Max that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Dec 4, 2023.

Performance

PBFR vs. XXXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PBFR vs. XXXX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF	-0.75%	10.44%	5.53%
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN	-24.00%	17.36%	12.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBFR achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly higher than XXXX's -24.00% return.

PBFR

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: -1.46%
• YTD: -0.75%
• 6M: 1.42%
• 1Y: 10.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XXXX

• 1D: 11.44%
• 1M: -21.62%
• YTD: -24.00%
• 6M: -23.21%
• 1Y: 18.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBFR vs. XXXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBFR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than XXXX's 2.95% expense ratio.

XXXX

MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN

PBFR

PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF

Return for Risk

PBFR vs. XXXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBFR

PBFR Risk / Return Rank: 79
PBFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
PBFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
PBFR Omega Ratio Rank: 86
PBFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PBFR Martin Ratio Rank: 87

XXXX

XXXX Risk / Return Rank: 27
XXXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
XXXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
XXXX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
XXXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
XXXX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBFR vs. XXXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBFR	XXXX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	0.26	+1.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	0.88	+1.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.13	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	0.49	+1.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.86	1.74	+9.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PBFR vs. XXXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBFR Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the XXXX Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBFR and XXXX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBFR	XXXX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	0.26	+1.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	0.41	+0.79

Correlation

The correlation between PBFR and XXXX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PBFR vs. XXXX - Dividend Comparison

PBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while XXXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PBFR vs. XXXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBFR drawdown since its inception was -8.50%, smaller than the maximum XXXX drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBFR and XXXX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBFR	XXXX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.50%	-62.27%	+53.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.15%	-43.00%	+36.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-30.07%	+28.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.68%	-12.03%	+11.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	12.20%	-11.16%

Volatility

PBFR vs. XXXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) is 2.42%, while MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a volatility of 21.11%. This indicates that PBFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XXXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBFR	XXXX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.42%	21.11%	-18.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.46%	37.70%	-34.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.18%	72.25%	-64.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.13%	61.78%	-54.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.13%	61.78%	-54.65%