PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLO vs. MSOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLO vs. MSOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF (TSLO) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLO achieves a -5.63% return, which is significantly higher than MSOO's -23.81% return.


TSLO

1D
-0.08%
1M
5.33%
YTD
-5.63%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSOO

1D
-6.75%
1M
-28.26%
YTD
-23.81%
6M
-38.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLO vs. MSOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSLO and MSOO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLO vs. MSOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF (TSLO) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TSLO vs. MSOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLOMSOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

-1.13

+1.59

Drawdowns

TSLO vs. MSOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLO drawdown since its inception was -25.40%, smaller than the maximum MSOO drawdown of -72.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLO and MSOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLOMSOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.40%

-72.39%

+46.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.53%

-70.12%

+61.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.88%

-47.41%

+39.53%

Volatility

TSLO vs. MSOO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLOMSOODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.08%

69.25%

-31.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.08%

69.25%

-31.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.08%

69.25%

-31.17%

TSLO vs. MSOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLO has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than MSOO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLO vs. MSOO - Dividend Comparison

TSLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.92%, more than MSOO's 2.13% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TSLO and MSOO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSLO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSLO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for MSOO.

TSLO has the higher dividend yield at 20.92%, compared with 2.13% for MSOO.

Their fees differ too: 0.77% for TSLO and 0.78% for MSOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLO and MSOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer