TSLL vs. UMAC
TSLL (Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while UMAC (Unusual Machines, Inc) is a stock. Over the past year, TSLL returned 13.30% vs 189.11% for UMAC. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TSLL vs. UMAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLL achieves a -28.34% return, which is significantly lower than UMAC's 91.76% return.
TSLL
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -9.76%
- YTD
- -28.34%
- 6M
- -32.14%
- 1Y
- 13.30%
- 3Y*
- -3.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UMAC
- 1D
- -5.02%
- 1M
- 50.80%
- YTD
- 91.76%
- 6M
- 143.81%
- 1Y
- 189.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLL vs. UMAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | -28.34% | -26.80% | 219.95% |
UMAC Unusual Machines, Inc | 91.76% | -24.26% | 320.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLL and UMAC is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2024 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLL vs. UMAC — Risk / Return Rank
TSLL
UMAC
TSLL vs. UMAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) and Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLL | UMAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.28 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | 3.76 | -3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.65 | 7.55 | -6.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLL vs. UMAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLL drawdown since its inception was -82.88%, which is greater than UMAC's maximum drawdown of -75.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLL and UMAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLL | UMAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.88% | -75.61% | -7.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.75% | -52.63% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.81% | -26.90% | -36.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.85% | -46.13% | -7.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.01% | 26.13% | +0.88% |
Volatility
TSLL vs. UMAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) is 28.50%, while Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC) has a volatility of 63.64%. This indicates that TSLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLL | UMAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.50% | 63.64% | -35.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.37% | 100.84% | -43.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.62% | 134.80% | -46.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 107.00% | 164.83% | -57.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.00% | 164.83% | -57.83% |
Dividends
TSLL vs. UMAC - Dividend Comparison
TSLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%, while UMAC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | 7.14% | 5.00% | 2.47% | 4.44% | 1.57% |
UMAC Unusual Machines, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLL and UMAC have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMAC has higher volatility (63.64%) compared to TSLL (28.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLL dropped -82.88% vs UMAC's -75.61%.
UMAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLL and UMAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer