TSLL vs. QTJL
TSLL (Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSLL returned -7.94%/yr vs 19.09%/yr for QTJL. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLL charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
TSLL vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLL achieves a -39.31% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 7.39% return.
TSLL
- 1D
- -3.38%
- 1M
- -24.58%
- YTD
- -39.31%
- 6M
- -48.10%
- 1Y
- -11.43%
- 3Y*
- -7.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- 18.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLL vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | -39.31% | -26.80% | 99.63% | 139.86% | -74.99% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 7.39% | 21.07% | 16.50% | 42.39% | -9.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLL and QTJL is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022 | 0.57 |
The correlation between TSLL and QTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
TSLL vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSLL
QTJL
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSLL
QTJL
Basic Materials
TSLL
-
QTJL
Communication Services
TSLL
-
QTJL
Consumer Defensive
TSLL
-
QTJL
Energy
TSLL
-
QTJL
Financial Services
TSLL
-
QTJL
Healthcare
TSLL
-
QTJL
Industrials
TSLL
-
QTJL
Real Estate
TSLL
-
QTJL
Technology
TSLL
-
QTJL
Utilities
TSLL
-
QTJL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLL vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
TSLL
QTJL
TSLL vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLL | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.39 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 2.78 | -2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 14.63 | -15.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLL vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLL drawdown since its inception was -82.88%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLL and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLL | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.88% | -33.40% | -49.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.75% | -6.68% | -48.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.88% | -22.43% | -60.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.35% | -0.03% | -69.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.93% | -7.84% | -46.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.51% | 1.27% | +26.24% |
Volatility
TSLL vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) has a higher volatility of 28.32% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.60%. This indicates that TSLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLL | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.32% | 0.60% | +27.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.74% | 7.39% | +49.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.53% | 9.86% | +77.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 106.85% | 20.30% | +86.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.85% | 20.30% | +86.55% |
TSLL vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLL has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLL vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
TSLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.63%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | 8.63% | 5.00% | 2.47% | 4.44% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLL and QTJL have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLL has higher volatility (28.32%) compared to QTJL (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLL dropped -82.88% vs QTJL's -33.40%.
On 3-year performance, QTJL leads with 19.09% vs -7.94% for TSLL. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 19.09% return vs -7.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for TSLL.
TSLL has the higher dividend yield at 8.63%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for TSLL and 0.79% for QTJL.
QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLL and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer