TSLL vs. QTAP

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TSLL (Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSLL returned -7.94%/yr vs 19.75%/yr for QTAP. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLL charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.

Performance

TSLL vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLL achieves a -39.31% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 12.75% return.

TSLL

• 1D: -3.38%
• 1M: -24.58%
• YTD: -39.31%
• 6M: -48.10%
• 1Y: -11.43%
• 3Y*: -7.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTAP

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: 12.75%
• 6M: 12.65%
• 1Y: 21.29%
• 3Y*: 19.75%
• 5Y*: 12.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLL vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF	-39.31%	-26.80%	99.63%	139.86%	-74.99%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	12.75%	19.36%	17.34%	43.32%	-18.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLL and QTAP is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022	0.54

The correlation between TSLL and QTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

TSLL vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TSLL	QTAP
Consumer Cyclical	100.0%	12.5%
Basic Materials	-	1.3%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	8.7%
Energy	-	0.7%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	5.1%
Industrials	-	3.3%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	50.7%
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

TSLL vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLL

TSLL Risk / Return Rank: 9
TSLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
TSLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
TSLL Omega Ratio Rank: 11
TSLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
TSLL Martin Ratio Rank: 7

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLL vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSLL	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	3.54	-3.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.43	5.75	-5.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.89	-0.84
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.21	8.59	-8.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.42	48.57	-48.99

TSLL vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLL Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLL and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSLL vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLL drawdown since its inception was -82.88%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLL and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLL	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.88%	-29.44%	-53.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.75%	-2.49%	-52.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-82.88%	-13.03%	-69.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-69.35%	-1.77%	-67.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.93%	-4.99%	-48.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.51%	0.44%	+27.07%

Volatility

TSLL vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) has a higher volatility of 28.32% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 3.03%. This indicates that TSLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLL	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.32%	3.03%	+25.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.74%	4.94%	+51.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.53%	6.09%	+81.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	106.85%	18.92%	+87.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	106.85%	18.71%	+88.14%

TSLL vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLL has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLL vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

TSLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.63%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF	8.63%	5.00%	2.47%	4.44%	1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLL and QTAP in my portfolio?

TSLL and QTAP have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLL or QTAP?

TSLL has higher volatility (28.32%) compared to QTAP (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLL dropped -82.88% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, TSLL or QTAP?

On 3-year performance, QTAP leads with 19.75% vs -7.94% for TSLL. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLL or QTAP?

Over the 3-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 19.75% return vs -7.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLL or QTAP?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for TSLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLL or QTAP?

TSLL has the higher dividend yield at 8.63%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.

What is the main difference between TSLL and QTAP?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for TSLL and 0.79% for QTAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.