TSLL vs. COTG
TSLL (Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. TSLL charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
TSLL vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLL achieves a -20.85% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 17.32% return.
TSLL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 13.88%
- YTD
- -20.85%
- 6M
- -21.38%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- 17.32%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLL vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | -20.85% | 5.77% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 17.32% | -21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLL and COTG is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLL vs. COTG — Risk / Return Rank
TSLL
COTG
TSLL vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLL | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLL | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | -0.28 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
TSLL vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLL drawdown since its inception was -82.88%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLL and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLL | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.88% | -25.69% | -57.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.03% | -23.48% | -36.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.82% | -8.35% | -45.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.72% | — | — |
Volatility
TSLL vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLL | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.38% | 40.65% | +51.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 106.87% | 40.65% | +66.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.87% | 40.65% | +66.22% |
TSLL vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLL has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLL vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
TSLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, while COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | 6.46% | 5.00% | 2.47% | 4.44% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLL and COTG have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for TSLL.
TSLL has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for TSLL and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for TSLL and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer