PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLG vs. NEBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLG vs. NEBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLG achieves a -20.71% return, which is significantly lower than NEBX's 498.05% return.


TSLG

1D
3.94%
1M
14.75%
YTD
-20.71%
6M
-14.74%
1Y
8.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NEBX

1D
-3.62%
1M
151.00%
YTD
498.05%
6M
322.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLG vs. NEBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-20.71%50.51%
NEBX
Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF
498.05%-43.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLG and NEBX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLG vs. NEBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

NEBX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLG vs. NEBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLGNEBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.24

TSLG vs. NEBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLGNEBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.34

2.27

-2.61

Drawdowns

TSLG vs. NEBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLG drawdown since its inception was -82.86%, which is greater than NEBX's maximum drawdown of -77.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLG and NEBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLGNEBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.86%

-77.97%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.94%

-3.62%

-56.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.72%

-41.09%

-17.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.54%

Volatility

TSLG vs. NEBX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLGNEBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.55%

193.29%

-100.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

115.47%

193.29%

-77.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

115.47%

193.29%

-77.82%

TSLG vs. NEBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NEBX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLG vs. NEBX - Dividend Comparison

TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, while NEBX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TSLG and NEBX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for NEBX.

TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 8.26%, compared with 0.00% for NEBX.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TSLG and 1.30% for NEBX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLG and NEBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer