PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLD.L vs. WM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLD.L vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP GBP (TSLD.L) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TSLD.L is traded in GBp, while WM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WM values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLD.L achieves a -24.50% return, which is significantly lower than WM's 5.67% return.


TSLD.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-10.93%
YTD
-24.50%
6M
-28.39%
1Y
5.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WM

1D
1.09%
1M
6.90%
YTD
5.67%
6M
5.20%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLD.L vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSLD.L
IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP GBP
-24.50%7.88%-8.70%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
5.67%2.63%2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLD.L and WM is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2024

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLD.L vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLD.L
TSLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TSLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

WM
WM Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
WM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
WM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
WM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
WM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLD.L vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP GBP (TSLD.L) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLD.LWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.06

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

0.35

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

0.67

-0.48

TSLD.L vs. WM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLD.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the WM Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLD.L and WM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLD.L vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLD.L drawdown since its inception was -45.93%, which is greater than WM's maximum drawdown of -30.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLD.L and WM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLD.LWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.93%

-30.43%

-15.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.39%

-14.88%

-29.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.89%

-6.47%

-34.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.99%

-7.04%

-18.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.19%

7.62%

+18.57%

Volatility

TSLD.L vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP GBP (TSLD.L) has a higher volatility of 10.02% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 7.24%. This indicates that TSLD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLD.LWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.02%

7.24%

+2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.08%

15.77%

+9.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.70%

20.56%

+34.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.62%

19.60%

+35.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.62%

20.56%

+34.06%

Dividends

TSLD.L vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

TSLD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.25%, more than WM's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TSLD.L
IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP GBP
35.25%58.23%4.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.57%1.50%1.49%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLD.L and WM have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLD.L and WM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer