TSLA.NEO vs. CRSH
Compare and contrast key facts about Tesla Inc CDR (TSLA.NEO) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH).
CRSH is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on May 1, 2024.
Performance
TSLA.NEO vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TSLA.NEO vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLA.NEO Tesla Inc CDR | -15.83% | 7.74% | 122.48% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 19.87% | -17.37% | -49.47% |
Different Trading Currencies
TSLA.NEO is traded in CAD, while CRSH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CRSH values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLA.NEO achieves a -15.83% return, which is significantly lower than CRSH's 19.87% return.
TSLA.NEO
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- -15.83%
- 6M
- -18.14%
- 1Y
- 38.03%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRSH
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- 7.74%
- YTD
- 19.87%
- 6M
- 23.75%
- 1Y
- -26.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLA.NEO vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank
TSLA.NEO
CRSH
TSLA.NEO vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tesla Inc CDR (TSLA.NEO) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLA.NEO | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | -0.61 | +1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | -0.65 | +1.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.92 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | -0.59 | +2.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.77 | -0.79 | +4.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLA.NEO | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | -0.61 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | -0.62 | +0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLA.NEO and CRSH is -0.90. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TSLA.NEO vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison
TSLA.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 100.61%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLA.NEO Tesla Inc CDR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 100.61% | 138.78% | 94.25% |
Drawdowns
TSLA.NEO vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLA.NEO drawdown since its inception was -74.23%, which is greater than CRSH's maximum drawdown of -63.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLA.NEO and CRSH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLA.NEO | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.23% | -63.68% | -10.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.86% | -48.16% | +20.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.61% | -53.43% | +29.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.94% | -41.91% | +5.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.44% | 35.23% | -23.79% |
Volatility
TSLA.NEO vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison
Tesla Inc CDR (TSLA.NEO) has a higher volatility of 11.20% compared to YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) at 8.39%. This indicates that TSLA.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TSLA.NEO | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.20% | 8.39% | +2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.68% | 24.14% | +4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.23% | 43.41% | +9.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.29% | 49.29% | +10.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.29% | 49.29% | +10.00% |