PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLA.NEO vs. CRSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TSLA.NEO vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Tesla Inc CDR (TSLA.NEO) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TSLA.NEO vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSLA.NEO
Tesla Inc CDR
-15.83%7.74%122.48%
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
19.87%-17.37%-49.47%
Different Trading Currencies

TSLA.NEO is traded in CAD, while CRSH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CRSH values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLA.NEO achieves a -15.83% return, which is significantly lower than CRSH's 19.87% return.


TSLA.NEO

1D
2.49%
1M
-5.81%
YTD
-15.83%
6M
-18.14%
1Y
38.03%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
10Y*

CRSH

1D
-1.90%
1M
7.74%
YTD
19.87%
6M
23.75%
1Y
-26.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLA.NEO vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLA.NEO
TSLA.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TSLA.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLA.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLA.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLA.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLA.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

CRSH
CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLA.NEO vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tesla Inc CDR (TSLA.NEO) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLA.NEOCRSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

-0.61

+1.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.35

-0.65

+1.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.92

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

-0.59

+2.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.77

-0.79

+4.56

TSLA.NEO vs. CRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLA.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the CRSH Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLA.NEO and CRSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLA.NEOCRSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

-0.61

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

-0.62

+0.76

Correlation

The correlation between TSLA.NEO and CRSH is -0.90. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

TSLA.NEO vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison

TSLA.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 100.61%.


TTM20252024
TSLA.NEO
Tesla Inc CDR
0.00%0.00%0.00%
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
100.61%138.78%94.25%

Drawdowns

TSLA.NEO vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLA.NEO drawdown since its inception was -74.23%, which is greater than CRSH's maximum drawdown of -63.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLA.NEO and CRSH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLA.NEOCRSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.23%

-63.68%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.86%

-48.16%

+20.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.61%

-53.43%

+29.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.94%

-41.91%

+5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.44%

35.23%

-23.79%

Volatility

TSLA.NEO vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison

Tesla Inc CDR (TSLA.NEO) has a higher volatility of 11.20% compared to YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) at 8.39%. This indicates that TSLA.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TSLA.NEOCRSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.20%

8.39%

+2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.68%

24.14%

+4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.23%

43.41%

+9.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.29%

49.29%

+10.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.29%

49.29%

+10.00%