TSL vs. WTIU
TSL (GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TSL is actively managed, while WTIU is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSL returned 0.02%/yr vs -1.04%/yr for WTIU. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TSL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.
Performance
TSL vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSL achieves a -36.68% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 95.37% return.
TSL
- 1D
- 4.19%
- 1M
- -22.91%
- 6M
- -31.12%
- YTD
- -36.68%
- 1Y
- 0.94%
- 3Y*
- 0.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -7.13%
WTIU
- 1D
- -4.60%
- 1M
- 39.23%
- 6M
- 55.77%
- YTD
- 95.37%
- 1Y
- 104.76%
- 3Y*
- -1.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.63M | $7.71M | $12.52M | |
| $1.41M | $930.94K | $851.49K |
TSL vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | -36.68% | 3.49% | 64.12% | 12.75% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 95.37% | -17.13% | -29.63% | -28.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSL and WTIU is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2023 | 0.06 |
The correlation between TSL and WTIU shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TSL vs. WTIU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSL
WTIU
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSL
WTIU
-
Basic Materials
TSL
-
WTIU
-
Communication Services
TSL
-
WTIU
-
Consumer Defensive
TSL
-
WTIU
-
Energy
TSL
-
WTIU
Financial Services
TSL
-
WTIU
-
Healthcare
TSL
-
WTIU
-
Industrials
TSL
-
WTIU
-
Real Estate
TSL
-
WTIU
-
Technology
TSL
-
WTIU
-
Utilities
TSL
-
WTIU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSL vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
TSL
WTIU
TSL vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSL | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.25 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | 2.19 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.05 | 4.99 | -4.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSL vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSL drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, roughly equal to the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSL and WTIU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSL | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.52% | -75.73% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.38% | -48.11% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.30% | -75.73% | +12.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.52% | -30.75% | -16.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.51% | -39.20% | +0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.82% | 21.07% | -1.25% |
Volatility
TSL vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) has a higher volatility of 25.38% compared to MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) at 22.17%. This indicates that TSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSL | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.38% | 22.17% | +3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.47% | 57.97% | -14.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.91% | 69.79% | -11.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.44% | 70.86% | +2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.44% | 70.86% | +2.58% |
TSL vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSL vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSL nor WTIU has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 60.47% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSL and WTIU have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSL has higher volatility (25.38%) compared to WTIU (22.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSL dropped -74.52% vs WTIU's -75.73%.
On 3-year performance, TSL leads with 0.02% vs -1.04% for WTIU. On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, WTIU has been the lower-risk option at 22.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TSL has performed better with a 0.02% return vs -1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSL.
TSL and WTIU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSL and 0.95% for WTIU.
WTIU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSL and WTIU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer