PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSL vs. NVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSL vs. NVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSL achieves a -36.68% return, which is significantly lower than NVD's -34.27% return.


TSL

1D
4.19%
1M
-22.91%
6M
-31.12%
YTD
-36.68%
1Y
0.94%
3Y*
0.02%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-7.13%

NVD

1D
-5.81%
1M
-14.55%
6M
-34.17%
YTD
-34.27%
1Y
-48.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-78.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$439.12M$390.53M$343.34M
$7.63M$7.71M$12.52M

TSL vs. NVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TSL
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF
-36.68%3.49%64.12%4.90%
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
-34.27%-73.27%-93.09%-15.28%

Correlation

The correlation between TSL and NVD is -0.44, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023

-0.35

TSL vs. NVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TSL
NVD

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

200.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

TSL
100.0%
NVD

-

Basic Materials

TSL

-

NVD

-

Communication Services

TSL

-

NVD

-

Consumer Defensive

TSL

-

NVD

-

Energy

TSL

-

NVD

-

Financial Services

TSL

-

NVD

-

Healthcare

TSL

-

NVD

-

Industrials

TSL

-

NVD

-

Real Estate

TSL

-

NVD

-

Technology

TSL

-

NVD
200.0%

Utilities

TSL

-

NVD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSL vs. NVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSL
TSL Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSL Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

NVD
NVD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSL vs. NVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLNVDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.92

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

-0.82

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.05

-1.46

+1.51

TSL vs. NVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSL Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is higher than the NVD Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSL and NVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSL vs. NVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSL drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, smaller than the maximum NVD drawdown of -99.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSL and NVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLNVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.52%

-99.26%

+24.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.38%

-59.80%

+11.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.52%

-99.11%

+51.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.51%

-82.51%

+44.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.82%

33.42%

-13.60%

Volatility

TSL vs. NVD - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) have volatilities of 25.38% and 24.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLNVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.38%

24.57%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.47%

57.71%

-14.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.91%

73.34%

-15.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.44%

92.04%

-18.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.44%

92.04%

-18.60%

TSL vs. NVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NVD's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSL vs. NVD - Dividend Comparison

TSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.99%.


PositionTTM202520242023
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
17.99%11.83%8.68%15.78%
TSL
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%60.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSL and NVD have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSL has higher volatility (25.38%) compared to NVD (24.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSL dropped -74.52% vs NVD's -99.26%.

On 1-year performance, TSL leads with 0.94% vs -48.83% for NVD. On fees, TSL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, NVD has been the lower-risk option at 24.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSL has performed better with a 0.94% return vs -48.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.

NVD has the higher dividend yield at 17.99%, compared with 0.00% for TSL.

TSL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSL and 1.50% for NVD.

TSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSL and NVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer