PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSL vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSL vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSL achieves a -20.75% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.


TSL

1D
-7.14%
1M
-13.27%
YTD
-20.75%
6M
-28.13%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
6.89%
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
-12.86%
1M
11.99%
YTD
744.89%
6M
773.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSL vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSL and LINT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.33

TSL vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TSL
LINT

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

TSL
100.0%
LINT

-

Basic Materials

TSL

-

LINT

-

Communication Services

TSL

-

LINT

-

Consumer Defensive

TSL

-

LINT

-

Energy

TSL

-

LINT

-

Financial Services

TSL

-

LINT

-

Healthcare

TSL

-

LINT

-

Industrials

TSL

-

LINT

-

Real Estate

TSL

-

LINT

-

Technology

TSL

-

LINT
100.0%

Utilities

TSL

-

LINT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSL vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSL
TSL Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSL Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSL Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSL vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLLINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.29

TSL vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSL vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSL drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSL and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.52%

-49.54%

-24.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.31%

-12.86%

-21.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.56%

-20.48%

-18.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.12%

Volatility

TSL vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLLINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.77%

168.83%

-113.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.10%

168.83%

-95.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.10%

168.83%

-95.73%

TSL vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSL vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

TSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.


PositionTTM202520242023
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
0.10%0.25%0.00%0.00%
TSL
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%60.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSL and LINT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSL.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for TSL.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSL and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSL and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer