TSL vs. COTG
TSL (GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. TSL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
TSL vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSL achieves a -9.40% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 17.32% return.
TSL
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- -9.40%
- 6M
- -9.11%
- 1Y
- 20.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- 17.32%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSL vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | -9.40% | 7.91% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 17.32% | -21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSL and COTG is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSL vs. COTG — Risk / Return Rank
TSL
COTG
TSL vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSL | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.26 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSL | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | -0.28 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
TSL vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSL drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSL and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSL | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.52% | -25.69% | -48.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.91% | -23.48% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.71% | -8.35% | -30.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.38% | — | — |
Volatility
TSL vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSL | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.12% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.94% | 40.65% | +17.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.18% | 40.65% | +32.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.18% | 40.65% | +32.53% |
TSL vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSL vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSL nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 60.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSL and COTG have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSL.
TSL and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSL and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for TSL and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer