TSII vs. OOQB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSII (REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF) and OOQB (Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSII is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX, while OOQB is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSII charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for OOQB.

Performance

TSII vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSII achieves a -6.73% return, which is significantly higher than OOQB's -18.43% return.

TSII

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 6.19%
• YTD: -6.73%
• 6M: -7.31%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OOQB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -18.43%
• 6M: -23.44%
• 1Y: -25.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSII vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSII REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF	-6.73%	43.72%
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	-18.43%	-9.85%

Correlation

The correlation between TSII and OOQB is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

TSII vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OOQB

OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 5
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 5
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSII vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSII	OOQB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	-0.41	+1.16

Drawdowns

TSII vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSII drawdown since its inception was -29.03%, smaller than the maximum OOQB drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSII and OOQB.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSII	OOQB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.03%	-53.44%	+24.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-53.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.76%	-43.69%	+28.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.31%	-23.20%	+13.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	29.99%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TSII	OOQB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	39.88%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.04%	51.57%	-5.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.04%	58.21%	-12.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.04%	58.21%	-12.17%

TSII vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSII vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison

TSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 70.30%, more than OOQB's 11.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	11.62%	9.53%
TSII REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF	70.30%	32.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSII and OOQB in my portfolio?

TSII and OOQB have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TSII or OOQB?

On fees, OOQB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSII or OOQB?

OOQB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSII or OOQB?

TSII has the higher dividend yield at 70.30%, compared with 11.62% for OOQB.

What is the main difference between TSII and OOQB?

TSII is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OOQB is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: REX and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSII and 0.75% for OOQB.