TSII vs. MSTZ
TSII (REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSII is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSII returned -2.85% vs 159.07% for MSTZ. Their -0.43 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TSII charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
TSII vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSII achieves a -35.03% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's -30.44% return.
TSII
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -22.61%
- 6M
- -32.70%
- YTD
- -35.03%
- 1Y
- -2.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -8.22%
MSTZ
- 1D
- 8.95%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- 6M
- -24.16%
- YTD
- -30.44%
- 1Y
- 159.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -86.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $101.73M | $133.33M | $177.41M | |
| $1.63M | $1.31M | $1.07M |
TSII vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSII REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF | -35.03% | 39.41% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -30.44% | 265.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSII and MSTZ is -0.45, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025 | -0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSII vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
TSII
MSTZ
TSII vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSII | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.28 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 2.44 | -2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.29 | 4.53 | -4.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSII vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSII drawdown since its inception was -44.14%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSII and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSII | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.14% | -99.38% | +55.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.14% | -84.89% | +40.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.63% | -97.63% | +57.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -94.63% | +83.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.75% | 45.62% | -29.87% |
Volatility
TSII vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) is 24.75%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 37.86%. This indicates that TSII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSII | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.75% | 37.86% | -13.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.69% | 134.52% | -96.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.70% | 150.23% | -102.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.45% | 169.87% | -119.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.45% | 169.87% | -119.42% |
TSII vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSII vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
TSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.28%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSII REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF | 109.28% | 32.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSII and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (37.86%) compared to TSII (24.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSII dropped -44.14% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 159.07% vs -2.85% for TSII. On fees, TSII is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSII has been the lower-risk option at 24.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 159.07% return vs -2.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSII is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.
TSII has the higher dividend yield at 109.28%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
TSII is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSII and 1.05% for MSTZ.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSII and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer