TSGGX vs. FSRTX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

TSGGX (TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund) and FSRTX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, TSGGX returned 9.92%/yr vs 5.44%/yr for FSRTX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSGGX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FSRTX.

Performance

TSGGX vs. FSRTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TSGGX having a 8.21% return and FSRTX slightly higher at 8.53%. Over the past 10 years, TSGGX has outperformed FSRTX with an annualized return of 9.92%, while FSRTX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.44% annualized return.

TSGGX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 1.14%
• YTD: 8.21%
• 6M: 8.76%
• 1Y: 21.56%
• 3Y*: 16.38%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: 9.92%

FSRTX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 8.53%
• 6M: 8.80%
• 1Y: 16.10%
• 3Y*: 9.87%
• 5Y*: 5.96%
• 10Y*: 5.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSGGX vs. FSRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TSGGX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund	8.21%	17.42%	12.98%	19.45%	-18.19%	13.49%	17.44%	23.66%	-9.29%	18.11%
FSRTX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M	8.53%	10.08%	5.57%	4.33%	-3.58%	15.50%	3.49%	10.24%	-4.26%	3.78%

Correlation

The correlation between TSGGX and FSRTX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2011	0.55

The correlation between TSGGX and FSRTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TSGGX vs. FSRTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSGGX

TSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 51
TSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
TSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
TSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
TSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
TSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FSRTX

FSRTX Risk / Return Rank: 96
FSRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FSRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FSRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FSRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FSRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSGGX vs. FSRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSGGX	FSRTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	3.45	-1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	4.81	-1.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.68	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	7.86	-5.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.98	30.68	-19.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSGGX vs. FSRTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSGGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is lower than the FSRTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSGGX and FSRTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSGGX	FSRTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	3.45	-1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.87	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.81	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.56	+0.19

Drawdowns

TSGGX vs. FSRTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSGGX drawdown since its inception was -29.75%, smaller than the maximum FSRTX drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSGGX and FSRTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSGGX	FSRTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.75%	-33.57%	+3.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.60%	-2.06%	-6.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.88%	-5.87%	-8.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.86%	-12.89%	-12.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.75%	-19.88%	-9.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	-0.83%	+0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.16%	-4.42%	+0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	0.53%	+1.43%

Volatility

TSGGX vs. FSRTX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX) at 1.29%. This indicates that TSGGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSGGX	FSRTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.18%	1.29%	+1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.50%	3.70%	+4.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.62%	4.69%	+5.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.23%	6.91%	+6.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.20%	6.73%	+7.47%

TSGGX vs. FSRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSGGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRTX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSGGX vs. FSRTX - Dividend Comparison

TSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%, more than FSRTX's 3.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSRTX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M	3.89%	4.44%	4.56%	5.05%	7.07%	5.14%	2.02%	2.81%	9.10%	2.32%	2.06%	1.41%
TSGGX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund	6.59%	7.14%	2.83%	2.34%	8.15%	11.10%	6.38%	4.81%	5.33%	0.63%	3.82%	5.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSGGX and FSRTX in my portfolio?

TSGGX and FSRTX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSGGX or FSRTX?

TSGGX has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to FSRTX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSGGX dropped -29.75% vs FSRTX's -33.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.