TSGGX vs. TILGX

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

TSGGX (TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund) and TILGX (TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class) are both mutual funds - TSGGX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by TIAA Investments, while TILGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by TIAA Investments. Over the past 10 years, TSGGX returned 10.49%/yr vs 16.73%/yr for TILGX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSGGX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TILGX.

Performance

TSGGX vs. TILGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSGGX achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly higher than TILGX's 0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, TSGGX has underperformed TILGX with an annualized return of 10.49%, while TILGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.73% annualized return.

TSGGX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -0.30%
• YTD: 7.10%
• 6M: 6.42%
• 1Y: 17.51%
• 3Y*: 15.61%
• 5Y*: 7.34%
• 10Y*: 10.49%

TILGX

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -5.71%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: -0.85%
• 1Y: 11.27%
• 3Y*: 19.63%
• 5Y*: 8.79%
• 10Y*: 16.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSGGX vs. TILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TSGGX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund	7.10%	17.42%	12.98%	19.45%	-18.19%	13.49%	17.44%	23.66%	-9.29%	18.11%
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class	0.41%	15.25%	29.23%	47.05%	-32.76%	16.84%	44.23%	30.76%	-0.38%	33.89%

Correlation

The correlation between TSGGX and TILGX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2011	0.90

The correlation between TSGGX and TILGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSGGX vs. TILGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSGGX

TSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 47
TSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
TSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
TSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
TSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
TSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

TILGX

TILGX Risk / Return Rank: 13
TILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
TILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
TILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
TILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
TILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSGGX vs. TILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSGGX	TILGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	0.78	+0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	1.15	+1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.14	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	0.83	+1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.29	2.72	+6.57

TSGGX vs. TILGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSGGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the TILGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSGGX and TILGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSGGX vs. TILGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSGGX drawdown since its inception was -29.75%, smaller than the maximum TILGX drawdown of -52.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSGGX and TILGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSGGX	TILGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.75%	-52.16%	+22.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.60%	-15.19%	+6.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.88%	-23.94%	+10.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.86%	-37.86%	+12.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.75%	-37.86%	+8.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-7.21%	+5.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-8.83%	+4.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	4.63%	-2.62%

Volatility

TSGGX vs. TILGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) is 4.58%, while TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that TSGGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSGGX	TILGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	5.54%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.40%	11.98%	-2.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.30%	16.19%	-4.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.35%	21.98%	-8.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.18%	21.63%	-7.45%

TSGGX vs. TILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSGGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TILGX's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSGGX vs. TILGX - Dividend Comparison

TSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, less than TILGX's 13.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class	13.82%	13.87%	6.41%	0.22%	0.42%	10.49%	37.04%	4.41%	14.12%	3.83%	1.82%	3.80%
TSGGX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund	6.66%	7.14%	2.83%	2.34%	8.15%	11.10%	6.38%	4.81%	5.33%	0.63%	3.82%	5.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSGGX and TILGX in my portfolio?

TSGGX and TILGX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSGGX or TILGX?

TILGX has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to TSGGX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSGGX dropped -29.75% vs TILGX's -52.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSGGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.