TSEL vs. QUS
TSEL (Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. TSEL is actively managed, while QUS is passively managed. Over the past year, TSEL returned 9.55% vs 17.65% for QUS. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSEL charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
TSEL vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSEL achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly lower than QUS's 6.67% return.
TSEL
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 9.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUS
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 6.67%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 17.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.67%
TSEL vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSEL Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF | 3.62% | 11.16% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 6.67% | 13.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSEL and QUS is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2025 | 0.57 |
The correlation between TSEL and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSEL vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
TSEL
QUS
TSEL vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF (TSEL) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSEL | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 1.95 | -1.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 2.81 | -2.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.35 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 2.59 | -2.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.01 | 11.54 | -10.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSEL | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 1.95 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.77 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
TSEL vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSEL drawdown since its inception was -28.95%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSEL and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSEL | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.95% | -33.78% | +4.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.47% | -6.85% | -16.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.07% | -0.50% | -4.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -3.70% | -4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.44% | 1.53% | +7.91% |
Volatility
TSEL vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF (TSEL) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.78%. This indicates that TSEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSEL | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 1.78% | +3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.63% | 6.66% | +8.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.34% | 9.09% | +11.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.78% | 14.33% | +12.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.78% | 16.42% | +10.36% |
TSEL vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSEL has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSEL vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
TSEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
TSEL Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSEL and QUS have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSEL has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSEL dropped -28.95% vs QUS's -33.78%.
On 1-year performance, QUS leads with 17.65% vs 9.55% for TSEL. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QUS has performed better with a 17.65% return vs 9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for TSEL.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for TSEL.
They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for TSEL and 0.15% for QUS.
QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSEL and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer