TSEL vs. MFUS
TSEL (Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. TSEL is actively managed, while MFUS is passively managed. Over the past year, TSEL returned -2.29% vs 25.38% for MFUS. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TSEL charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
TSEL vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSEL achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.05% return.
TSEL
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- 6M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- -2.19%
- 1Y
- -2.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.22%
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 1Y
- 25.38%
- 3Y*
- 19.23%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.61M | $1.05M | $936.81K | |
| $148.20K | $176.52K | $1.25M |
TSEL vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSEL Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF | -2.19% | 12.41% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.05% | 15.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSEL and MFUS is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025 | 0.56 |
The correlation between TSEL and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSEL vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
TSEL
MFUS
TSEL vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF (TSEL) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSEL | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.39 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 3.86 | -4.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.51 | 14.64 | -15.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSEL vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSEL drawdown since its inception was -28.95%, smaller than the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSEL and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSEL | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.95% | -35.21% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.47% | -6.39% | -17.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.40% | -2.61% | -7.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.22% | -3.95% | -4.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.02% | 1.68% | +8.34% |
Volatility
TSEL vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF (TSEL) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) at 2.93%. This indicates that TSEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSEL | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 2.93% | +5.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.23% | 9.11% | +9.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.63% | 11.43% | +11.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.02% | 15.02% | +12.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.02% | 17.28% | +9.74% |
TSEL vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSEL has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSEL vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
TSEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
TSEL Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSEL and MFUS have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSEL has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to MFUS (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSEL dropped -28.95% vs MFUS's -35.21%.
On 1-year performance, MFUS leads with 25.38% vs -2.29% for TSEL. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, MFUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 25.38% return vs -2.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for TSEL.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.00% for TSEL.
They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for TSEL and 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSEL and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer