PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSEL vs. LCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSEL vs. LCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF (TSEL) and Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSEL achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly lower than LCF's 4.06% return.


TSEL

1D
-1.53%
1M
4.36%
YTD
3.62%
6M
2.58%
1Y
9.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LCF

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.09%
YTD
4.06%
6M
5.01%
1Y
20.57%
3Y*
17.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSEL vs. LCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSEL and LCF is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2025

0.82

The correlation between TSEL and LCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSEL vs. LCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSEL
TSEL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TSEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSEL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TSEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSEL Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

LCF
LCF Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCF Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSEL vs. LCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF (TSEL) and Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSELLCFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.47

1.73

-1.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.76

2.43

-1.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.31

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

1.77

-1.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.01

7.32

-6.30

TSEL vs. LCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSEL Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the LCF Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSEL and LCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSELLCFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

1.73

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.03

-0.63

Drawdowns

TSEL vs. LCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSEL drawdown since its inception was -28.95%, which is greater than LCF's maximum drawdown of -18.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSEL and LCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSELLCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.95%

-18.28%

-10.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.47%

-11.67%

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.07%

-1.53%

-3.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-2.82%

-5.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.44%

2.82%

+6.62%

Volatility

TSEL vs. LCF - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF (TSEL) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) at 2.69%. This indicates that TSEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSELLCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

2.69%

+2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.63%

9.08%

+6.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.34%

11.92%

+8.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.78%

15.47%

+11.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.78%

15.47%

+11.31%

TSEL vs. LCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSEL has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than LCF's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSEL vs. LCF - Dividend Comparison

TSEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
LCF
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF
0.52%0.55%0.63%0.71%0.24%
TSEL
Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSEL and LCF have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSEL has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to LCF (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSEL dropped -28.95% vs LCF's -18.28%.

On 1-year performance, LCF leads with 20.57% vs 9.55% for TSEL. On fees, TSEL is cheaper at 0.67% per year. On volatility, LCF has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LCF has performed better with a 20.57% return vs 9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSEL is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LCF.

LCF has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for TSEL.

TSEL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while LCF is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for TSEL and 0.70% for LCF.

LCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSEL and LCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer