TSEL vs. FITZ
TSEL (Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSEL charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.
Performance
TSEL vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TSEL
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 8.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSEL vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TSEL Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF | -0.21% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSEL and FITZ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSEL vs. FITZ — Risk / Return Rank
TSEL
FITZ
TSEL vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF (TSEL) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSEL | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.95 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSEL | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | -7.29 | +7.70 |
Drawdowns
TSEL vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSEL drawdown since its inception was -28.95%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -1.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSEL and FITZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSEL | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.95% | -1.97% | -26.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.76% | -1.97% | -2.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -1.08% | -7.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.45% | — | — |
Volatility
TSEL vs. FITZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSEL | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.33% | 8.74% | +11.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.74% | 8.74% | +18.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.74% | 8.74% | +18.00% |
TSEL vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSEL has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSEL vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSEL nor FITZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TSEL and FITZ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSEL is cheaper at 0.67% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSEL is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.
TSEL and FITZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for TSEL and 0.75% for FITZ.
Find the right allocation for TSEL and FITZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer