TSDD vs. QQQI
TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSDD returned -62.65% vs 29.65% for QQQI. At a correlation of -0.60, they often move in opposite directions. TSDD charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.
Performance
TSDD vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSDD achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 13.11% return.
TSDD
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 19.15%
- 1Y
- -62.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQI
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 13.11%
- 6M
- 12.48%
- 1Y
- 29.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 1.03% | -74.84% | -92.71% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.11% | 18.62% | 19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSDD and QQQI is -0.60, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | -0.60 |
The correlation between TSDD and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.60 to -0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
TSDD vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSDD
QQQI
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSDD
QQQI
Basic Materials
TSDD
-
QQQI
Communication Services
TSDD
-
QQQI
Consumer Defensive
TSDD
-
QQQI
Energy
TSDD
-
QQQI
Financial Services
TSDD
-
QQQI
Healthcare
TSDD
-
QQQI
Industrials
TSDD
-
QQQI
Real Estate
TSDD
-
QQQI
Technology
TSDD
-
QQQI
Utilities
TSDD
-
QQQI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSDD vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
TSDD
QQQI
TSDD vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSDD | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.38 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 3.10 | -3.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | 13.29 | -14.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSDD vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSDD drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDD and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSDD | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.03% | -20.00% | -79.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.39% | -9.61% | -62.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.84% | -0.46% | -98.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.58% | -2.20% | -69.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.36% | 2.24% | +54.12% |
Volatility
TSDD vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a higher volatility of 25.52% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 7.00%. This indicates that TSDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSDD | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.52% | 7.00% | +18.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.17% | 11.66% | +44.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.59% | 14.51% | +74.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.18% | 17.44% | +96.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.18% | 17.44% | +96.74% |
TSDD vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSDD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSDD vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, less than QQQI's 14.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 14.54% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 8.34% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSDD and QQQI have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDD has higher volatility (25.52%) compared to QQQI (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSDD dropped -99.03% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 29.65% vs -62.65% for TSDD. On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 7.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 29.65% return vs -62.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSDD.
QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 14.54%, compared with 8.34% for TSDD.
TSDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Neos. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSDD and 0.68% for QQQI.
QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSDD and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer