TSDD vs. QQMG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) and QQMG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while QQMG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index. TSDD is actively managed, while QQMG is passively managed. Over the past year, TSDD returned -46.78% vs 26.88% for QQMG. Their -0.58 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TSDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQMG.

Performance

TSDD vs. QQMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSDD achieves a 47.87% return, which is significantly higher than QQMG's 13.63% return.

TSDD

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: 44.87%
• 6M: 39.90%
• YTD: 47.87%
• 1Y: -46.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -69.01%

QQMG

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: -2.81%
• 6M: 12.56%
• YTD: 13.63%
• 1Y: 26.88%
• 3Y*: 23.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF	$914.06K	$1.31M	$1.13M
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF	$166.67M	$161.08M	$200.09M

TSDD vs. QQMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF	47.87%	-74.84%	-89.21%	-20.49%
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF	13.63%	22.16%	25.66%	12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between TSDD and QQMG is -0.66, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023	-0.58

The correlation between TSDD and QQMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.66 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

TSDD vs. QQMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TSDD	QQMG
Consumer Cyclical	200.0%	10.6%
Basic Materials	-	1.4%
Communication Services	-	11.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.2%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	3.3%
Industrials	-	1.2%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	66.2%
Utilities	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

TSDD vs. QQMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSDD

TSDD Risk / Return Rank: 6
TSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
TSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
TSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 7
TSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
TSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 6

QQMG

QQMG Risk / Return Rank: 51
QQMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QQMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QQMG Omega Ratio Rank: 47
QQMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
QQMG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSDD vs. QQMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSDD	QQMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.49	1.23	-1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.27	1.74	-2.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.21	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.65	1.95	-2.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.80	6.22	-7.02

TSDD vs. QQMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSDD Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the QQMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSDD and QQMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSDD vs. QQMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSDD drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than QQMG's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDD and QQMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSDD	QQMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.03%	-35.43%	-63.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.48%	-12.67%	-56.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.31%	-7.14%	-91.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.61%	-9.44%	-63.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	56.09%	3.96%	+52.13%

Volatility

TSDD vs. QQMG - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a higher volatility of 37.07% compared to Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) at 7.21%. This indicates that TSDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSDD	QQMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.07%	7.21%	+29.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	67.48%	16.64%	+50.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.71%	20.09%	+72.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	115.20%	23.81%	+91.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	115.20%	23.81%	+91.39%

TSDD vs. QQMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQMG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSDD vs. QQMG - Dividend Comparison

TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than QQMG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.38%	0.41%	0.50%	0.60%	0.82%	0.08%
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF	5.70%	8.42%	0.00%	24.84%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSDD and QQMG in my portfolio?

TSDD and QQMG have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSDD or QQMG?

TSDD has higher volatility (37.07%) compared to QQMG (7.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSDD dropped -99.03% vs QQMG's -35.43%.

Which ETF is better, TSDD or QQMG?

On 1-year performance, QQMG leads with 26.88% vs -46.78% for TSDD. On fees, QQMG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QQMG has been the lower-risk option at 7.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSDD or QQMG?

Over the 1-year period, QQMG has performed better with a 26.88% return vs -46.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSDD or QQMG?

QQMG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TSDD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSDD or QQMG?

TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 0.38% for QQMG.

What is the main difference between TSDD and QQMG?

TSDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QQMG is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TSDD and 0.20% for QQMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.