PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSDD vs. MSFL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TSDD vs. MSFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TSDD vs. MSFL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF
35.06%-74.84%-93.47%
MSFL
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF
-43.95%16.99%-9.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSDD achieves a 35.06% return, which is significantly higher than MSFL's -43.95% return.


TSDD

1D
-9.22%
1M
13.73%
YTD
35.06%
6M
13.74%
1Y
-80.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSFL

1D
6.35%
1M
-12.11%
YTD
-43.95%
6M
-52.20%
1Y
-14.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TSDD vs. MSFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSDD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TSDD vs. MSFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSDD
TSDD Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
TSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
TSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFL
MSFL Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MSFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFL Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFL Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSDD vs. MSFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSDDMSFLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.73

-0.27

-0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.15

-0.04

-1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.99

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

-0.27

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.02

-0.69

-0.34

TSDD vs. MSFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSDD Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the MSFL Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSDD and MSFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSDDMSFLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

-0.27

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.64

-0.47

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between TSDD and MSFL is -0.38. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

TSDD vs. MSFL - Dividend Comparison

TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, while MSFL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
TSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF
6.24%8.42%0.00%24.84%
MSFL
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TSDD vs. MSFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSDD drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than MSFL's maximum drawdown of -59.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDD and MSFL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TSDDMSFLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.03%

-59.39%

-39.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-90.32%

-59.39%

-30.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.45%

-56.32%

-42.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.36%

-19.41%

-49.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

77.72%

23.60%

+54.12%

Volatility

TSDD vs. MSFL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a higher volatility of 22.66% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) at 13.12%. This indicates that TSDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TSDDMSFLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.66%

13.12%

+9.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.34%

39.15%

+20.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

110.31%

52.83%

+57.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

116.28%

47.91%

+68.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

116.28%

47.91%

+68.37%