MSFL vs. ^GSPC
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and S&P 500 (^GSPC).
MSFL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Mar 15, 2024.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MSFL or ^GSPC.
Key characteristics
| MSFL | ^GSPC | |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Std Dev | 38.86% | 12.69% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.48% | -56.78% |
| Current Drawdown | -17.08% | -0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFL and ^GSPC is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDrawdowns
MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFL drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFL and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) has a higher volatility of 10.42% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 3.99%. This indicates that MSFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.