PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MSFL vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MSFL and ^GSPC is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-9.34%
6.72%
MSFL
^GSPC

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

MSFL:

41.98%

^GSPC:

12.88%

Max Drawdown

MSFL:

-29.48%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

MSFL:

-29.22%

^GSPC:

-2.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFL achieves a -7.70% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 2.24% return.


MSFL

YTD

-7.70%

1M

-17.15%

6M

-9.34%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

2.24%

1M

-1.20%

6M

6.72%

1Y

18.21%

5Y*

12.53%

10Y*

11.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MSFL vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFL

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
MSFL
^GSPC


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Drawdowns

MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFL drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFL and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-29.22%
-2.13%
MSFL
^GSPC

Volatility

MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) has a higher volatility of 16.56% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 3.43%. This indicates that MSFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
16.56%
3.43%
MSFL
^GSPC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab