MSFL vs. ^GSPC
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and S&P 500 (^GSPC).
MSFL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Mar 15, 2024.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MSFL or ^GSPC.
Correlation
The correlation between MSFL and ^GSPC is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MSFL:
41.98%
^GSPC:
12.88%
MSFL:
-29.48%
^GSPC:
-56.78%
MSFL:
-29.22%
^GSPC:
-2.13%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFL achieves a -7.70% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 2.24% return.
MSFL
-7.70%
-17.15%
-9.34%
N/A
N/A
N/A
^GSPC
2.24%
-1.20%
6.72%
18.21%
12.53%
11.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MSFL vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MSFL
^GSPC
MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Drawdowns
MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFL drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFL and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) has a higher volatility of 16.56% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 3.43%. This indicates that MSFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.