PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSDD vs. TSLQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSDD vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TSDD having a 47.87% return and TSLQ slightly higher at 49.23%.


TSDD

1D
-1.55%
1M
44.87%
6M
39.90%
YTD
47.87%
1Y
-46.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-69.01%

TSLQ

1D
-1.53%
1M
45.07%
6M
40.85%
YTD
49.23%
1Y
-46.08%
3Y*
-60.20%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-54.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$166.67M$161.08M$200.09M
$162.68M$148.83M$161.26M

TSDD vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF
47.87%-74.84%-89.21%-20.49%
TSLQ
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF
49.23%-74.67%-83.21%-11.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TSDD and TSLQ is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023

0.99

The correlation between TSDD and TSLQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSDD vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSDD
TSDD Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLQ
TSLQ Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TSLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSDD vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSDDTSLQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.97

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

-0.64

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.80

-0.79

-0.01

TSDD vs. TSLQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSDD Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is comparable to the TSLQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSDD and TSLQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSDD vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSDD drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDD and TSLQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSDDTSLQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.03%

-98.73%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.48%

-69.32%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.31%

-97.78%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.61%

-68.42%

-4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.09%

55.83%

+0.26%

Volatility

TSDD vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) have volatilities of 37.07% and 36.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSDDTSLQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.07%

36.98%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.48%

67.32%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.71%

92.69%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

115.20%

95.64%

+19.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

115.20%

95.64%

+19.56%

TSDD vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLQ's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSDD vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison

TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, less than TSLQ's 7.08% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF
5.70%8.42%0.00%24.84%0.00%
TSLQ
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF
7.08%10.56%4.95%13.35%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, TSDD and TSLQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSDD has higher volatility (37.07%) compared to TSLQ (36.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSDD dropped -99.03% vs TSLQ's -98.73%.

On 1-year performance, TSLQ leads with -46.08% vs -46.78% for TSDD. On fees, TSDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLQ has performed better with a -46.08% return vs -46.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for TSLQ.

TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 5.70% for TSDD.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TSDD and 1.17% for TSLQ.

TSLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.48 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSDD and TSLQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer