TSDD vs. HLAL
TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while HLAL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the FTSE Shariah USA Index. TSDD is actively managed, while HLAL is passively managed. Over the past year, TSDD returned -65.45% vs 33.71% for HLAL. At a correlation of -0.61, they often move in opposite directions. TSDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HLAL.
Performance
TSDD vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSDD achieves a -7.24% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 16.33% return.
TSDD
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -7.72%
- 6M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- -7.24%
- 1Y
- -65.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HLAL
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 14.48%
- YTD
- 16.33%
- 1Y
- 33.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 14.36%
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | -7.24% | -74.84% | -89.21% | -20.49% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 16.33% | 18.30% | 16.70% | 8.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSDD and HLAL is -0.64, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | -0.61 |
The correlation between TSDD and HLAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.64 to -0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
TSDD vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSDD
HLAL
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSDD
HLAL
Basic Materials
TSDD
-
HLAL
Communication Services
TSDD
-
HLAL
Consumer Defensive
TSDD
-
HLAL
Energy
TSDD
-
HLAL
Financial Services
TSDD
-
HLAL
Healthcare
TSDD
-
HLAL
Industrials
TSDD
-
HLAL
Real Estate
TSDD
-
HLAL
Technology
TSDD
-
HLAL
Utilities
TSDD
-
HLAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSDD vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank
TSDD
HLAL
TSDD vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSDD | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.40 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 3.29 | -4.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 13.24 | -14.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSDD vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSDD drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than HLAL's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDD and HLAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSDD | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.03% | -33.57% | -65.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.48% | -10.20% | -59.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.94% | -2.09% | -96.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.07% | -4.98% | -67.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.47% | 2.53% | +51.94% |
Volatility
TSDD vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a higher volatility of 35.87% compared to Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) at 6.06%. This indicates that TSDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSDD | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.87% | 6.06% | +29.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.76% | 12.01% | +50.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.68% | 14.64% | +75.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.68% | 17.84% | +96.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.68% | 20.24% | +94.44% |
TSDD vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSDD vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison
TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.08%, more than HLAL's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.45% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 9.08% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSDD and HLAL have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDD has higher volatility (35.87%) compared to HLAL (6.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSDD dropped -99.03% vs HLAL's -33.57%.
On 1-year performance, HLAL leads with 33.71% vs -65.45% for TSDD. On fees, HLAL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HLAL has been the lower-risk option at 6.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 33.71% return vs -65.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HLAL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TSDD.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 9.08%, compared with 0.45% for HLAL.
TSDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while HLAL is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TSDD and 0.50% for HLAL.
HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSDD and HLAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer