TSDD vs. CRSH
TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) and CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSDD returned -50.55% vs -8.28% for CRSH. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. TSDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CRSH.
Performance
TSDD vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSDD achieves a 37.39% return, which is significantly higher than CRSH's 23.69% return.
TSDD
- 1D
- -7.09%
- 1M
- 34.60%
- 6M
- 24.94%
- YTD
- 37.39%
- 1Y
- -50.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -69.67%
CRSH
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 14.88%
- 6M
- 16.23%
- YTD
- 23.69%
- 1Y
- -8.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $453.60K | $342.77K | $370.28K | |
| $152.97M | $157.39M | $198.36M |
TSDD vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 37.39% | -74.84% | -91.54% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 23.69% | -13.40% | -52.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSDD and CRSH is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024 | 0.96 |
The correlation between TSDD and CRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSDD vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank
TSDD
CRSH
TSDD vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSDD | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.99 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | -0.27 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | -0.43 | -0.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSDD vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSDD drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than CRSH's maximum drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDD and CRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSDD | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.03% | -63.68% | -35.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.22% | -30.50% | -37.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.43% | -51.34% | -47.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.64% | -43.99% | -28.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.18% | 20.48% | +35.70% |
Volatility
TSDD vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a higher volatility of 36.11% compared to YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) at 13.43%. This indicates that TSDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSDD | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.11% | 13.43% | +22.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.54% | 26.57% | +40.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.83% | 36.90% | +55.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 115.19% | 47.48% | +67.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.19% | 47.48% | +67.71% |
TSDD vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSDD vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison
TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, less than CRSH's 76.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 76.82% | 138.78% | 94.25% | 0.00% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 6.13% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, TSDD and CRSH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TSDD has higher volatility (36.11%) compared to CRSH (13.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSDD dropped -99.03% vs CRSH's -63.68%.
On 1-year performance, CRSH leads with -8.28% vs -50.55% for TSDD. On fees, TSDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CRSH has been the lower-risk option at 13.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CRSH has performed better with a -8.28% return vs -50.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 76.82%, compared with 6.13% for TSDD.
TSDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CRSH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TSDD and 0.99% for CRSH.
CRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSDD and CRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer