TSCV vs. IJJ
TSCV (Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF) and IJJ (iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSCV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Thrivent, while IJJ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. TSCV is actively managed, while IJJ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TSCV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IJJ.
Performance
TSCV vs. IJJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCV achieves a 20.85% return, which is significantly higher than IJJ's 13.12% return.
TSCV
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- YTD
- 20.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IJJ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 22.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $23.02M | $23.68M | $25.30M | |
| $63.49K | $44.24K | $64.04K |
TSCV vs. IJJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 20.85% | 6.24% |
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 13.12% | 3.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCV and IJJ is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCV vs. IJJ — Risk / Return Rank
TSCV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IJJ
TSCV vs. IJJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV) and iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSCV | IJJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.96 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSCV vs. IJJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCV drawdown since its inception was -10.17%, smaller than the maximum IJJ drawdown of -58.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCV and IJJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCV | IJJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.17% | -58.00% | +47.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | -1.19% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -7.89% | +6.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.97% | — |
Volatility
TSCV vs. IJJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCV | IJJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 15.10% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 19.36% | -3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 21.96% | -5.85% |
TSCV vs. IJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IJJ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSCV vs. IJJ - Dividend Comparison
TSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than IJJ's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.81% | 1.68% | 1.97% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.70% | 2.01% | 1.52% | 1.67% | 1.83% |
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 0.23% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, TSCV and IJJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IJJ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IJJ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TSCV.
IJJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.23% for TSCV.
TSCV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IJJ is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TSCV and 0.18% for IJJ.
Find the right allocation for TSCV and IJJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer