TSCSX vs. TMAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX).
TSCSX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jul 1, 1996. TMAAX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 2005.
Performance
TSCSX vs. TMAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TSCSX vs. TMAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCSX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S | -3.28% | 2.36% | 12.73% | 12.47% | -10.94% | 24.22% | 22.87% | 27.92% | -10.52% | 21.22% |
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | -4.21% | 15.13% | 19.29% | 17.06% | -17.79% | 15.74% | 14.13% | 21.47% | -6.30% | 11.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCSX achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly higher than TMAAX's -4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, TSCSX has outperformed TMAAX with an annualized return of 11.51%, while TMAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.73% annualized return.
TSCSX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -3.28%
- 6M
- -1.94%
- 1Y
- 10.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
TMAAX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- 1Y
- 12.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TSCSX vs. TMAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCSX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than TMAAX's 1.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TSCSX vs. TMAAX — Risk / Return Rank
TSCSX
TMAAX
TSCSX vs. TMAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSCSX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.46 | 0.94 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 1.40 | -0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.21 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 1.16 | -0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | 5.41 | -3.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSCSX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 0.94 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.53 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.66 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.42 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCSX and TMAAX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TSCSX vs. TMAAX - Dividend Comparison
TSCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than TMAAX's 7.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCSX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S | 2.44% | 2.36% | 3.18% | 0.46% | 9.60% | 11.33% | 1.60% | 8.72% | 15.00% | 6.68% | 4.19% | 8.34% |
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | 7.61% | 7.29% | 11.82% | 3.55% | 3.03% | 6.94% | 4.16% | 6.27% | 6.01% | 1.10% | 0.99% | 0.76% |
Drawdowns
TSCSX vs. TMAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCSX drawdown since its inception was -56.66%, which is greater than TMAAX's maximum drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCSX and TMAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCSX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.66% | -50.54% | -6.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.31% | -9.88% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.04% | -26.55% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.63% | -26.99% | -14.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.36% | -7.55% | -3.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -7.41% | -2.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 2.12% | +1.84% |
Volatility
TSCSX vs. TMAAX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) at 4.06%. This indicates that TSCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TSCSX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 4.06% | +2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 7.66% | +4.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.16% | 13.98% | +8.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 13.81% | +7.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 13.28% | +8.80% |