TSCM vs. QMID

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) and QMID (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. TSCM is actively managed, while QMID is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSCM charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for QMID.

Performance

TSCM vs. QMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCM achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly higher than QMID's 1.24% return.

TSCM

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 3.17%
• YTD: 2.68%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMID

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 1.24%
• 6M: -1.04%
• 1Y: 9.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSCM vs. QMID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF	2.68%	-1.32%
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	1.24%	-1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCM and QMID is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

TSCM vs. QMID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSCM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QMID

QMID Risk / Return Rank: 19
QMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
QMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
QMID Omega Ratio Rank: 17
QMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
QMID Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSCM vs. QMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSCM	QMID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.60	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.97	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.11	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.85	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.85	—

Drawdowns

TSCM vs. QMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCM drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum QMID drawdown of -24.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCM and QMID.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSCM	QMID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.87%	-24.42%	+9.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.52%	-2.94%	+1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.79%	-5.41%	-0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TSCM	QMID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.95%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.77%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.15%	15.14%	+6.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.15%	18.43%	+2.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.15%	18.43%	+2.72%

TSCM vs. QMID - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QMID's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSCM vs. QMID - Dividend Comparison

TSCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	0.51%	0.51%	1.16%
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSCM and QMID in my portfolio?

TSCM and QMID have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TSCM or QMID?

On fees, QMID is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSCM or QMID?

QMID is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSCM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSCM or QMID?

QMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.00% for TSCM.

What is the main difference between TSCM and QMID?

They also come from different issuers: TimesSquare Capital Management and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TSCM and 0.38% for QMID.