TSCM vs. PDP
TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) and PDP (Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSCM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TimesSquare Capital Management, while PDP is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index. TSCM is actively managed, while PDP is passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSCM charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for PDP.
Performance
TSCM vs. PDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCM achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly lower than PDP's 27.87% return.
TSCM
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 3.17%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PDP
- 1D
- -2.83%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- YTD
- 27.87%
- 6M
- 24.23%
- 1Y
- 40.34%
- 3Y*
- 24.48%
- 5Y*
- 11.14%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
TSCM vs. PDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 2.68% | -1.32% |
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 27.87% | -1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCM and PDP is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCM vs. PDP — Risk / Return Rank
TSCM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PDP
TSCM vs. PDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSCM | PDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSCM vs. PDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCM drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum PDP drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCM and PDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCM | PDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -59.34% | +44.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -2.83% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.79% | -10.58% | +4.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.36% | — |
Volatility
TSCM vs. PDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCM | PDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.15% | 23.02% | -1.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.15% | 22.21% | -1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.15% | 21.69% | -0.54% |
TSCM vs. PDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PDP's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSCM vs. PDP - Dividend Comparison
TSCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.08% | 0.17% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.25% | 0.18% | 0.28% | 0.81% | 0.39% |
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSCM and PDP have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSCM is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSCM is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PDP.
PDP has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for TSCM.
TSCM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while PDP is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: TimesSquare Capital Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TSCM and 0.62% for PDP.
Find the right allocation for TSCM and PDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer