TSCM vs. FSMB
TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) and FSMB (First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSCM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TimesSquare Capital Management, while FSMB is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSCM charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FSMB.
Performance
TSCM vs. FSMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCM achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly higher than FSMB's 1.26% return.
TSCM
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 3.17%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSMB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- 1.52%
- 10Y*
- —
TSCM vs. FSMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 2.68% | -1.32% |
FSMB First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF | 1.26% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCM and FSMB is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCM vs. FSMB — Risk / Return Rank
TSCM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FSMB
TSCM vs. FSMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF (FSMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSCM | FSMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.56 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSCM vs. FSMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCM drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, which is greater than FSMB's maximum drawdown of -6.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCM and FSMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCM | FSMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -6.32% | -8.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -0.15% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.79% | -1.15% | -4.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.38% | — |
Volatility
TSCM vs. FSMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCM | FSMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.15% | 1.40% | +19.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.15% | 1.96% | +19.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.15% | 2.91% | +18.24% |
TSCM vs. FSMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMB's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSCM vs. FSMB - Dividend Comparison
TSCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMB First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF | 3.14% | 3.09% | 2.88% | 2.40% | 1.47% | 1.20% | 1.79% | 2.27% | 0.19% |
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSCM and FSMB have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FSMB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FSMB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSCM.
FSMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 0.00% for TSCM.
TSCM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while FSMB is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: TimesSquare Capital Management and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TSCM and 0.45% for FSMB.
Find the right allocation for TSCM and FSMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer