PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSCIX vs. WMKSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSCIX vs. WMKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCIX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCIX achieves a 11.74% return, which is significantly lower than WMKSX's 20.68% return. Over the past 10 years, TSCIX has underperformed WMKSX with an annualized return of 10.65%, while WMKSX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.90% annualized return.


TSCIX

1D
2.50%
1M
3.58%
YTD
11.74%
6M
8.38%
1Y
14.96%
3Y*
9.39%
5Y*
1.68%
10Y*
10.65%

WMKSX

1D
1.67%
1M
5.13%
YTD
20.68%
6M
18.10%
1Y
37.28%
3Y*
24.61%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
13.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSCIX vs. WMKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSCIX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund
11.74%0.84%8.50%16.73%-26.42%7.34%35.36%44.90%-4.05%21.17%
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
20.68%16.19%22.12%19.42%-20.72%22.81%36.78%20.32%-13.92%13.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCIX and WMKSX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2000

0.89

The correlation between TSCIX and WMKSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSCIX vs. WMKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSCIX
TSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

WMKSX
WMKSX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
WMKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
WMKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSCIX vs. WMKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCIX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSCIXWMKSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.34

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

4.33

-3.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.56

14.51

-11.96

TSCIX vs. WMKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSCIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the WMKSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSCIX and WMKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSCIX vs. WMKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCIX drawdown since its inception was -49.74%, smaller than the maximum WMKSX drawdown of -64.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCIX and WMKSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSCIXWMKSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.74%

-64.09%

+14.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.91%

-8.50%

-10.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.48%

-24.20%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.51%

-39.84%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.51%

-39.84%

-0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

0.00%

-2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.63%

-15.66%

+4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

2.53%

+3.22%

Volatility

TSCIX vs. WMKSX - Volatility Comparison

AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCIX) has a higher volatility of 7.15% compared to WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX) at 4.89%. This indicates that TSCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSCIXWMKSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.15%

4.89%

+2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.38%

12.38%

+5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.09%

17.90%

+3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.76%

26.13%

-2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.68%

23.98%

-0.30%

TSCIX vs. WMKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than WMKSX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSCIX vs. WMKSX - Dividend Comparison

TSCIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WMKSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TSCIX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.69%0.00%6.63%22.45%13.38%22.41%30.72%10.75%3.70%11.91%
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
18.98%22.91%4.69%5.93%6.23%25.75%8.21%0.00%12.53%8.59%5.26%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSCIX and WMKSX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSCIX has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to WMKSX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCIX dropped -49.74% vs WMKSX's -64.09%.

WMKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSCIX and WMKSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer